Second most complex case

Second case a little more complex, a quiz of self-knowledge.

I chose to work by Groups because, by definition, there are no good or bad answers.

Here is my questionnaire (a generic view without titles of questions or answers):

Question 1 : ... only 1 answer possible

(Minimum number of answers = 1 and maximum number of answers = 1)

Réponse 1 : ... Group A

Réponse 2 : ... Group B

Réponse 3 : ... Group C

Question 2 : ... only possible answer

(Minimum number of answers = 1 and maximum number of answers = 1)

Réponse 1 : ... Group C

Réponse 2 : ... Group B

Réponse 3 : ... Group A

Réponse 4 : ... Group D

Question 3 : ... from 1 to 2 possible answers

(Minimum number of answers = 1 and maximum number of answers = 2)

Réponse 1 : ... Group A

Réponse 2 : ... Group C

Réponse 3 : ... Group B

Question 4 : ... 2 mandatory answers

(Minimum number of answers = 2 and maximum number of answers = 2)

Réponse 1 : ... Group E

Réponse 2 : ... Group B

Réponse 3 : ... Group A

Question 5 : ... from 0 to 1 possible answer

(Minimum number of answers = 0 and maximum number of answers = 1)

Réponse 1 : ... Group A

Réponse 2 : ... Group B

Réponse 3 : ... Group C

The questionnaire therefore consists of:

5 questions and can get

Between 5 answers minimum (1 + 1 + 1 + 2 +0)

And 7 responses maximum (1 + 1 + 2 + 2 + 1)

The available treatments after calculation are:

Only A and Majority of A

Only B and Majority of B

Majority of C (Only C is not possible because C is missing in question 4 which must have two mandatory responses)

Equality of A and B

Equality of A and C

Equality of B and C

Equality of A and B and C.

And as possibility of add solutions (as much as you want):

By answer

1st example of treatments selection:

Only A will correspond to a very defined type in the spirit of my quiz.

Only B to another very defined type.

A majority of A will be more nuanced always in the mind of my quiz

Majority of B also

A majority of C may be one between two.

I decide to treat equalities by substitution:

Equality of A and B is replaced by Majority of A.

Equality of A and C is replaced by Majority of C.

Equality of B and C is replaced by Majority of B.

Equality of A and B and C is replaced by Majority of A also.

So I used all available treatments without adding any more.

You will notice that all solutions being covered, I do not need to add the default treatment Lost or Thank you.

Now imagine that I want to target one or more types of results.

2nd example of selection of treatments:

I can use the treatment by Answer For example:

I want a result such as:

The answer 1 to question 1 A

+ Answer 3 to question 2 A

+ Answer 2 to question 3 C

+ Answer 1 to question 4 A

+ Answer 1 to question 5 A

triggers a particular content, so I select them in the treatment by answer and I register.

I set it as Master, fill its contents, select it, choose my gift and products, I register this configuration.

You will notice that the result corresponds to a majority of A, and as I have parameterized this treatment in Master, it will be chosen and not a majority of A.

This allows me to have a particular content in this case.

Then I can set another one or more "By answer" that correspond to other targets.

Once this or these treatments have been registered and selected, I must cover the other answers of the questionnaire.

I therefore select the other treatments needed:

Only A will correspond to a very defined type in the spirit of my quiz.

Only B to another very defined type.

A majority of A will be more nuanced always in the mind of my quiz

Majority of B also

A majority of C may be one between two.

I decide to treat equalities by substitution:

Equality of A and B is replaced by Majority of A.

Equality of A and C is replaced by Majority of C.

Equality of B and C is replaced by Majority of B.

Equality of A and B and C is replaced by Majority of A also.